Over 65% of B2B startup failures trace back to a GTM problem — not a product problem.

GTM due diligence for B2B founders

Know what is limiting growth and what to fix first — before you commit more budget, people, or time to a direction.

Before you hire, scale,
raise, or expand —
run due diligence
on your revenue engine.

Most founders don't have an execution problem.
They have a diagnosis problem.

Before you commit budget, people, or runway — understand what is actually limiting growth.

For B2B founders at any stage
7-day delivery
No calls required
Practitioner-reviewed
Introductory pricing
Serving founders in 🌎 North America 🇬🇧 United Kingdom 🌍 Europe 🌏 Asia
The questions founders are guessing at

Founders make significant decisions
without the information to make them well.

Should I hire an SDR or are we not ready for outbound yet?
Cost of getting this wrong$60K–$90K in misallocated headcount
Is our ICP too broad, or are we targeting the wrong buyer entirely?
Cost of getting this wrong4–6 months of misdirected outbound
Is this a messaging problem, a positioning problem, or something deeper?
Cost of getting this wrongagency executes the wrong strategy
Should I hire a VP Sales or am I not ready to hand this off yet?
Cost of getting this wrong$120K–$180K/yr plus a quarter of momentum
Why is outbound not converting when we're sending hundreds of messages?
Cost of getting this wrongmore volume into the same broken system
Is our GTM motion ready to scale or are we building on a broken foundation?
Cost of getting this wrongaccelerates every mistake already in the system
Are we ready to raise? Can we answer investor questions with evidence?
Cost of getting this wronga GTM story investors pull apart in the first meeting
Should we enter the US, UK, or stay focused where we already have traction?
Cost of getting this wrong$100K+ committed to a market that wasn't ready

Wiremap answers these questions before you make the decision — not after you've paid to find out the answer was wrong.

See the products →
The cost of guessing wrong

The cost of committing to the
wrong direction.

$60K–$90K
Wrong SDR Hire
Hired before the ICP was defined. Six months of outbound into the wrong market. The SDR was not the problem.
$24K–$60K
Wrong Agency
Executed perfectly against the wrong strategy. Deliverables arrived. Pipeline did not.
$120K–$180K
Wrong GTM Hire
VP Sales hired without a brief. First quarter spent figuring out what Wiremap would have answered in a week.
$100K+
Wrong Market
Expanded before the motion was validated. Different buyer, different urgency, different channel. Nothing transferred.
$499
The Wiremap
Understand what is actually limiting growth before you commit budget, people, or runway to a direction.

You run due diligence before you invest. Before you acquire. Before you sign. Run it before your next GTM decision too. The diagnosis costs less than a single day of a VP Sales hire — and tells you whether you are ready to make that hire at all.

Amulya Shankar
Amulya Shankar
Founder, Wiremap
20+
Years in B2B SaaS GTM
15+
Startups taken to revenue
$25M+
Pipeline built
Companies to $1M+ ARR
Why Wiremap exists

After reviewing hundreds of GTM plans, proposals, and growth strategies, one pattern appeared every time.

Founders were solving the wrong problem. Not because they lacked effort or intelligence. But because they committed to a direction before understanding what was actually wrong.

They hired before diagnosing. They executed before validating. They scaled before understanding. By the time the pattern was clear, months of runway had already been spent on the wrong problem.

The pattern that appeared — every time
Founder says: "Our SDR team isn't producing."
Reality: The ICP was too broad. The SDR was executing correctly against the wrong target.
Founder says: "Our messaging isn't landing."
Reality: The positioning was undifferentiated. Better copy into an unowned position still loses.
Founder says: "We need more leads."
Reality: They had a conversion problem, not a volume problem. More leads accelerated the leak.

"The moat is not domain expertise. A DevOps founder already understands DevOps better than we ever will. What they are paying for is commercial pattern recognition — the ability to translate what they know about their product into what is actually blocking revenue. That translation, turned into a repeatable structured system, is what Wiremap does."

Who this works for

Any B2B company where commercial complexity is the constraint — not technical complexity. The pattern recognition transfers across industries because the commercial questions are the same.

✓ B2B SaaS — all verticals
✓ Technology-enabled services
✓ AI and data products
✓ Cybersecurity and compliance
✓ FinTech and HR Tech
✓ B2B managed and professional services
Three products. Three decision stages.

What are you trying to decide?

Pick the product that matches where you are. Each one is built around the decision you are trying to make — not the deliverable you receive.

✦ Introductory pricing — prices are increasing shortly ✦
GTM Clarity Assessment
$499 current
Standard rate $799
GTM Risk Assessment
$999 current
Standard rate $1,499
Revenue Due Diligence
$2,499 current
Standard rate $3,999

Introductory pricing is available now. We deliberately launched at a price point that makes it easy to run the diagnosis before a major decision — because we believe founders should not have to spend $10,000 to find out what is actually blocking their growth. Standard rates are higher and will apply shortly. If current pricing is showing, it is still available.

Stage 1 · Pre-revenue to first traction
GTM Clarity Assessment
For founders asking: Am I pointing in the right direction before I spend more?
$499 introductory · standard rate $799
Decision this supports
"Should I keep building this motion, or is something fundamentally wrong before I go further?"
  • ICP assessment — who to actually target
  • Positioning analysis vs your 3 competitors
  • Messaging audit — what your copy signals to buyers
  • GTM Scorecard across 8 dimensions
  • Channel and geography assessment
  • 30-day priority action plan
  • GTM Maturity Grid — where you are, what's next
  • Executive summary — one page, top findings first
14 days to submit 7 business days delivery
Run the Assessment — $499
Stage 3 · Funded, pre-scale
Revenue Due Diligence
For founders asking: Are we ready to raise, expand, or restructure our entire GTM?
$2,499 introductory · standard rate $3,999
Decision this supports
"We are about to commit $500K+ to a direction. Before we do, we need to know what is actually working and what is not."
  • Full pipeline data analysis from your CRM
  • Conversion pattern identification by segment and title
  • Root cause — why deals die where they die
  • ICP validation from actual closed-won data
  • Marketing and sales alignment assessment
  • 90-day structured action plan in three phases
  • Personal Loom walkthrough — 20 to 30 minutes
  • CEO summary document for investor conversations
30 days to submit 10 business days delivery
Run Revenue Due Diligence — $2,499
🌎
North America
US and Canada. USD pricing via PayPal. Async delivery.
🇬🇧
United Kingdom
Strong focus on UK B2B SaaS and regulated sectors.
🌍
Europe
EU markets including DACH, Nordics, and Benelux.
🌏
Asia
India, Singapore, SEA. INR via Razorpay for India.
Everything after this — GTM framework design, advisory, implementation — is custom scoped after your due diligence is complete. No public pricing. No two situations are the same. Reach out after your report →
What the diagnosis actually finds

What the diagnosis actually finds

Real findings from real engagements. Company names withheld. The pattern of what gets discovered — consistently — across sectors and stages.

Compliance SaaS · London · GTM Clarity Assessment
What the founder believed
"Your ICP is not wrong. It is too broad. 'Financial services' describes 45,000 firms. Your buyer is CCOs at FCA-regulated asset managers under Consumer Duty pressure. That is 800 people."
↗ ICP narrowed. Outbound reply rate tripled in 30 days.
READ FULL REPORT →
Cybersecurity Services · Los Angeles · GTM Clarity Assessment
What the founder believed
"Your positioning is not weak. It is invisible. You have worked with aerospace supply chain companies for years. That is a differentiator you have never named. Name it."
↗ Repositioned around aerospace niche. First structured outbound launched.
READ FULL REPORT →
B2B Collaboration SaaS · Europe / US · GTM Clarity Assessment
What the founder believed
"The ICP was not wrong. The market was. Marketing agencies do not have a compliance problem. Legal and financial advisory firms do — and this product was built specifically for them."
↗ ICP pivoted to regulated professional services. Compliance positioning adopted.
READ FULL REPORT →
AI Hiring Platform · India → US · GTM Risk Assessment
What the founder believed
"The motion that worked in Bangalore is not transferring because the buyer is different, not because the product is wrong. Your US ICP has a different urgency trigger, a different job title, and a different objection. Same product. Different GTM."
↗ US GTM rebuilt from new ICP. First US meetings booked within 45 days.
READ FULL REPORT →
Patient Engagement SaaS · North America · Revenue Due Diligence
What the founder believed
"You do not have a repeatable motion. Every deal you have closed has come from a personal relationship. Investors will ask this question and you are not ready to answer it. Here is exactly what a repeatable motion looks like for your product."
↗ GTM narrative rebuilt. Round closed 6 weeks after the report.
READ FULL REPORT →

These are the findings. Each card links to the full report — scorecard, analysis, action plan, and maturity grid included.

What changed after the diagnosis

What changed after the diagnosis.

Early Stage · Compliance SaaS · London
Finding: ICP one layer too broad. Right industry, wrong buyer persona and no urgency trigger.
We had been running the same outbound for six months. Three weeks after applying the Wiremap findings, we booked 8 qualified meetings. That had never happened in a single month before.
Seed-Stage Founder
8 qualified meetings — month one
Growth Stage · Revenue Intelligence · New York
Finding: No repeatable motion. All pipeline from founder network. Investor question unanswerable.
Our investors kept asking about our repeatable GTM motion. We couldn't answer. The Wiremap gave us the answer and the evidence. The round closed six weeks after we implemented the findings.
Pre-Series A Founder
Round closed 6 weeks later
Growth Stage · Workflow SaaS · Bangalore → US
Finding: Sales hire brief undefined. VP would have rebuilt the motion from scratch in month one.
We were about to hire a Head of Sales. The Wiremap gave us the exact brief to hand them on day one. We probably saved six months of them figuring out what the report answered in a week.
Bootstrapped Founder
$72K+ in misdirected runway avoided

Company names withheld by request. Outcomes verified from delivered engagements.

Not a one-time report. A recurring practice.

Every major decision that touches
your revenue engine deserves a diagnosis.

The founders who get the most from Wiremap do not buy once. They return every time something significant is about to change — before committing budget, headcount, or direction to a decision that cannot easily be undone.

👤
Before hiring or letting go of a sales or GTM person
Whether you are bringing someone in or recognising a mis-hire — run the diagnosis before the decision. Know what brief to give them or what gap you are actually trying to fill.
🛠️
Before implementing a new CRM, tool, or outbound system
Tools execute direction. Before you invest in new infrastructure, confirm the direction is correct. A CRM running the wrong motion at scale is more expensive than no CRM at all.
🌍
Before entering a new market or geography
The ICP, positioning, channel, and urgency trigger that worked in one market rarely transfers unchanged to the next. Validate before you commit headcount and budget to the assumption that it will.
🚀
When the product changes significantly
A new feature set, a new use case, a pivot driven by client feedback — each one can shift who your real buyer is. When the product changes, the GTM that was built around the old product may no longer fit.
📊
When client feedback is being built into the roadmap
Client feedback reveals what existing customers want. It does not always reveal what the next ICP cohort needs. Before reshaping product around feedback, confirm it is the right signal from the right buyers.
💰
Before raising or entering investor conversations
Investors will stress-test your GTM story. The diagnosis gives you the evidence to answer their questions — not founder narrative, but structured commercial intelligence built from your actual data.
📉
When pipeline stalls or conversion rates drop unexpectedly
A sudden drop in conversion is a signal, not a verdict. Before you change pricing, rebuild sequences, or fire the SDR — run the diagnosis. The problem is rarely where it appears to be.
🔄
When the motion stops working but nothing obvious changed
Markets shift. Competitors reposition. Buyer priorities evolve. A GTM motion that produced results six months ago can quietly stop working. Quarterly diagnosis catches drift before it becomes a crisis.
Early Stage founders

Run a diagnosis every time something meaningful changes.

At early stage, your GTM assumptions are still being tested. The ICP you started with is probably not the ICP that will scale. The channel that worked for the first 5 clients may not work for the next 50. Every significant shift in the business — new feature, new hire, new market signal — is a reason to re-diagnose before doubling down.

⟳ Every major decision · or every 90 days
Growth Stage founders

Make quarterly GTM diagnosis a standard operating practice.

At growth stage, the cost of running the wrong motion at scale is measured in hundreds of thousands of dollars. A quarterly Revenue Due Diligence is the difference between catching a drift early and discovering six months later that the ICP shifted, the messaging stopped landing, and the pipeline has been quietly degrading while the team stayed busy. The diagnosis is the board meeting your GTM motion never gets.

⟳ Quarterly · before every major GTM decision

"The founders who avoid expensive GTM mistakes are not luckier.
They diagnose before they commit."

Wiremap is the practice you build around every decision that touches revenue.
The process

Four steps. No calls required.

Complete at your own pace. No calls required at any stage. Findings delivered to your portal when ready.

1
Pay and Access
Pay and receive your intake form link within 30 minutes. Specific to the product you chose.
30 minutes
2
Complete Intake
Fill in the intake form at your pace. 14 to 30 days to submit depending on product. Save and return anytime.
Your pace
3
Practitioner Review
Every submission is read before any analysis runs. Every finding validated against 20 years of pattern recognition.
7–10 business days
4
Findings Delivered
Your report arrives with a scored maturity grid, priority action plan, and the one thing to fix before anything else.
Delivered
Questions before you commit

Frequently asked

The short answer: less than you think. The intake form is structured to guide you through exactly what is needed. Nothing is assumed. Nothing requires perfect documentation. But knowing what to gather in advance makes the process faster. Here is what each product typically requires.

GTM Clarity Assessment — $499 · 14 days to submit

Suitable for founders who may not have formal documentation yet. You will need:

  • ·A description of your product and the problem it solves — in your own words
  • ·Your current ICP hypothesis — who you believe your buyer is, even if it is informal
  • ·Your website URL and any outreach copy or sequences you have run
  • ·A description of what you have tried so far — channels, campaigns, results
  • ·Names of 2 to 3 competitors you know of
  • ·Any customer or prospect feedback you have received — even informal

Who fills this in: the founder, or a co-founder. No other departments required. Most founders complete this in one sitting of 25 to 35 minutes.

GTM Risk Assessment — $999 · 14 days to submit

Requires more operational context. You will need everything from the GTM Clarity Assessment, plus:

  • ·Your current ARR or MRR — even approximate
  • ·A summary of your sales motion — outbound, inbound, referral, or a mix
  • ·Your current tech stack — what tools you are using for outreach, CRM, and tracking
  • ·Outbound metrics if available — emails sent, reply rates, meetings booked, close rates
  • ·A description of the decision you are trying to make — the hire, the agency, the market
  • ·What is currently blocking growth in your view — even if you are unsure whether you are right

Who fills this in: the founder plus, if relevant, your Head of Sales or SDR lead for the operational metrics. Allow 35 to 50 minutes across one or two sessions.

Revenue Due Diligence — $2,499 · 30 days to submit

The most comprehensive intake. Requires data from multiple parts of the business. You will need everything from the GTM Risk Assessment, plus:

  • ·A pipeline export or summary from your CRM — open deals, stages, close rates, deal sizes
  • ·Closed-won data — which segments, titles, and company sizes have actually bought
  • ·Closed-lost data — where deals stall, what objections appear, which stages lose the most
  • ·Your current team structure — who owns what in sales, marketing, and GTM
  • ·Marketing performance if applicable — MQLs, conversion rates, channel breakdown
  • ·Any investor or board questions about GTM you are currently unable to answer cleanly
  • ·Your fundraising timeline and current investor conversation status if raising

Who fills this in: the founder with input from Head of Sales, Revenue Operations or whoever manages your CRM, and optionally your CFO or finance lead for revenue data. The 30-day window exists precisely because this data often needs to be pulled from multiple sources. You do not need everything on day one — start with what you have and gather the rest within your window.

If you are unsure whether you have enough information to complete the intake — start anyway. Partial information still produces useful findings. We will flag where additional data would strengthen the diagnosis and you can add it before you submit.

Yes — and that is the point. Every founder who goes through the intake process believes they know what the problem is. The findings consistently identify a different root cause. Not because founders are wrong about the symptoms. Because symptoms and causes are different things. The pattern recognition identifies which cause is producing which symptom — and that is almost always not what the founder assumed.
A consultant arrives, runs a discovery phase that takes 2 to 4 weeks, and delivers findings in meetings. The entire engagement takes 6 to 8 weeks and costs $10,000 to $30,000. The Wiremap delivers specific findings in 7 days for $499. Async. No meetings. No discovery phase. The diagnosis phase alone on a consultant engagement costs more than the entire Wiremap.
Apollo, Clay, Sales Navigator — these tools execute your direction. Wiremap gives you the direction. Every outbound tool assumes you already know who to target and what to say. If that assumption is wrong, those tools make the problem faster and more expensive. Wiremap validates the assumption before you run it at scale.
The price reflects the model, not the depth. The methodology is built and the pattern recognition is established — it does not need to be rebuilt for each client. What changes for each client is the application of that methodology to their specific intake data. The output is specific because the practitioner makes it specific, not because the price is high.
That is usually the most valuable report we deliver. The founders who get the most from Wiremap are the ones who discover that the problem was not what they thought — and can redirect before spending three more months and significant money going further in the wrong direction. The uncomfortable finding is the one worth paying for.
Yes. Reply to the email thread your report arrived in. Every report comes with a direct line back to the practitioner who reviewed it. No mandatory calls before or during — but the conversation is available after delivery if you want to discuss specific findings or next steps.
Yes — and the founders who get the most from Wiremap are the ones who treat it as a recurring practice rather than a one-time purchase. At early stage, we recommend running a diagnosis every time something significant changes — a new hire, a new market, a product pivot, a drop in conversion. At growth stage, a quarterly Revenue Due Diligence is increasingly standard for companies that take GTM seriously. Markets shift. Buyer priorities evolve. A motion that worked six months ago can quietly stop working. The diagnosis catches drift before it becomes a crisis. Each report is independent and complete — you do not need to have run a previous report to get full value from the next one.
Wiremap was deliberately launched at a price point that removes the friction from running a diagnosis before a major decision. We believe founders should not need a $10,000 consulting engagement to find out what is actually blocking their revenue. Introductory pricing reflects that belief. Standard rates — $799, $1,499, and $3,999 respectively — will apply when pricing moves. We will not announce the date in advance. If introductory pricing is showing when you visit, it is available. If it is not showing, it has moved.
Non-refundable once the report is delivered. The only exception: if we fail to deliver within the stated window due to a failure on our side, you may request a refund within 48 hours of the missed deadline with your order reference. We have not missed a delivery window.
No. And this is an important distinction. You already understand your industry better than we ever will. What Wiremap does is commercial pattern recognition — translating what you know about your product into what is actually blocking revenue. The commercial questions are the same across industries: who is the right buyer, what message reaches them, which channel converts, where the funnel breaks. Those patterns transfer across B2B SaaS, cybersecurity, HR tech, fintech, AI, services, and beyond.
This is a fair question and the answer is in the intake form. When you purchase a product, you receive a structured intake form specific to that product — a set of questions designed and sequenced to extract the commercial intelligence we need regardless of your industry. The questions cover your ICP hypothesis, your current GTM motion, your messaging, your sales history, your competitive landscape, your channel activity, and your growth constraints. They are built to draw out the right information whether you have it perfectly documented or scattered across your team. You have up to 14 days to complete the form — 30 days for the Deep Diagnostic — and you can work through it with your co-founder, Head of Sales, or anyone who holds the relevant context. Some information will be immediately available. Some will require you to pull data or talk to your team. That is intentional. The depth of the intake is what makes the diagnosis specific rather than generic. By the time you submit, we have everything we need to identify the commercial bottleneck — not because we know your industry, but because the intake structure gives us a complete picture of your commercial reality regardless of what sector you are in.
Nothing automatic. The report is yours. Implement the action plan, share it with your team, or use it to brief your next hire. If you want to go further — deeper root cause analysis, GTM framework design, or advisory — that conversation starts after delivery. Nothing is sold to you without your explicit request.
The due diligence you've been skipping

Before you hire, scale,
raise, or expand —
run due diligence
on your revenue engine.

Understand what is actually limiting growth before you commit to a direction. The diagnosis costs less than a single wrong decision.

7-day delivery · No mandatory calls · Introductory pricing · Practitioner-reviewed